Turf Masters is a brand new horse racing tipsters service that is operated by alleged ex professional jockey Martin O’Sullivan.
What does the product offer?
According to the sales page for the service, Turf Masters provides users with “devastating accurate” tips that leave all of the work done for you. This is pretty standard fare for a tipster service and does nothing to really explain the service (something that is a worryingly consistent theme).
In terms of what to expect from Turf Masters there is very little information available, something that I cannot emphasise enough. In fact, Martin O’ Sullivan provides no information whatsoever about how he operates the service.
Instead, there is a firm focus on telling the creators “story” which is something that I will look at below. All you can do as a Turf Masters user is wait for selections to land in your email and place the relevant bets if you are so inclined.
How does the product work?
As I have touched upon before now, Turf Masters is operated by an alleged ex professional jockey who says that he is aware of other ex-jockeys who use their insider knowledge of horse racing to make more money as a tipster than they did as a jockey.
This strongly suggests to me that Turf Masters is also based on insider knowledge. That having been said, there is no information provided about what this so called insider knowledge is or how it is utilised which when combined with a number of other things made me concerned that Turf Masters isn’t a legitimate system.
What is the initial investment?
Despite apparently wanting to make a living as a tipster, Martin O’Sullivan is selling Turf Masters for an extraordinarily cheap price, just £19.99 (plus VAT).
Fortunately, it is sold through Clickbank which means that Turf Masters also domes comes with a full 60 day money back guarantee should you find that you are unhappy with Turf Masters.
What is the rate of return?
Whilst most tipster services are happy to make a song and a dance about how much they have earned, Turf Masters takes a surprisingly contrarian approach. Instead, the income potential isn’t something that is touched upon which causes further worry for me.
Conclusion
Where do you begin with Turf Masters?
Perhaps the fact that the copy is somehow written out twice in what is one of the most poorly put together examples of writing I have looked at?
Or that for all intents and purposes there is nothing online to suggest that a jockey named Martin O’ Sullivan ever won at Epsom, Doncaster or Cheltenham? Nor is there any mention of a career ending injury at Canterbury* (which interestingly doesn’t have a racecourse, although the US and Australia both do).
This lack of any evidence that a single aspect of Turf Masters is truthful makes me believe that it simply isn’t something that is worth exploring. With a that in mind, not even a 60 day money back guarantee or a low price could convince me to spend any time or money on Turf Masters.
*Since I initially looked at Turf Masters, “Martin O’Sullivan” has obviously caught his mistake as the alleged accident is now listed as taking place at York.
